Air Permeability Test Procedure
Air permeability measures the rate at which air passes through a material—whether a textile fabric or a building envelope—under a specified pressure difference applied perpendicularly across a defined test area. This article focuses on practical, step-by-step test procedures rather than abstract theory, covering both fabric testing in laboratory settings and whole-building air tightness testing using blower door equipment. Getting the procedure right matters for repeatability, regulatory compliance with standards like ISO 9237:1995 for textiles or ATTMA/Part L for buildings, and maintaining consistent quality control. For instance, a fabric tested at 100 Pa and 20 cm² might show 500 mm/s air permeability, directly impacting its suitability for outdoor jackets.
Key purposes of air permeability testing:
- Assessing breathability and comfort properties in textile fabrics
- Verifying wind resistance for outdoor clothing and protective garments
- Confirming filtration efficiency for medical products and industrial filters
- Measuring air leakage rate through building envelopes for energy performance certification
- Ensuring proper ventilation design by quantifying envelope air tightness
Key Standards and Test Methods for Air Permeability
Test methods vary slightly depending on the governing standard, but the core steps—conditioning samples, applying a controlled pressure differential, and measuring air flow—remain fundamentally similar across all protocols.
Major textile standards:
- ISO 9237:1995 – Determines air permeability of fabrics using 100–2500 Pa pressure and 5–100 cm² test areas
- ASTM D737-18 – Standard test method for air permeability of textile fabrics; default 125 Pa pressure and 20 cm² test area
- BS 5636 – British standard for air permeability testing of fabrics
- GB/T 5453 – Chinese equivalent largely interchangeable with ISO 9237
- JIS L1096 – Japanese industrial standard covering airflow through textiles
Building-related guidance:
- ATTMA TSL1 – Technical Standard for measuring air permeability of building envelopes in dwellings (UK)
- ATTMA TSL2 – Covers non-dwellings and larger commercial structures
- Part L Building Regulations – UK regulatory framework referencing air tightness testing requirements for new dwellings
The procedural sections that follow primarily reference ISO 9237:1995 and ASTM D737-18 for fabric testing, alongside a generic blower door protocol aligned with ATTMA guidance for building envelopes.
Equipment Required for Air Permeability Tests
Accurate procedure depends on correctly specified and calibrated equipment. Whether you’re conducting textile testing in a controlled laboratory or measuring air leakage across an entire building fabric, the instrumentation must deliver reliable results within documented accuracy tolerances.
Textile Testing Equipment
An air permeability tester for fabrics typically includes:
- Test head with interchangeable orifices – Common sizes: 5, 20, 50, and 100 cm² to accommodate materials with different levels of openness
- Clamping ring with rubber gasket – Creates an airtight seal around the test sample to prevent air leakage around edges
- Differential pressure gauge – Measures pressure drop across the specimen; typical range 50–500 Pa with ≥2% accuracy
- Controlled vacuum or pressure source – Maintains stable pressure difference during measurement
- Airflow meter – Calibrated flow meters covering approximately 1–10,000 dm³/min with ±2% accuracy
- Digital display or data acquisition system – Outputs results directly in mm/s or L/(m²·s)
Modern instruments measure air flow rate automatically once the target differential pressure stabilizes, eliminating manual timing and calculation errors.
Building Testing Equipment (Blower Door Kit)
For whole-building air tightness testing, the essential kit comprises:
- Calibrated fan – Variable-speed fan capable of generating airflow sufficient to achieve 10–60 Pa pressure difference across the envelope
- Temporary door panel – Adjustable frame fitting standard external doorways; mounts the fan assembly
- Pressure hoses and taps – Connect internal and external reference points to the manometer
- Digital manometer – Measures pressure differential typically in the 10–1000 Pa range with resolution to 0.1 Pa
- Test software – Controls fan speed, logs data points, and calculates air permeability at reference pressures
- Leakage detection tools – Smoke pencils or infrared cameras help identify major leakage paths
Typical building test systems measure air permeability in the range of 0.01–20 m³/(h·m²) at 50 Pa, covering everything from highly sealed passive houses to older, leakier construction.
Sample Preparation and Conditioning
Correct specimen preparation is critical to obtaining a valid permeability test. Poorly prepared samples introduce variability that masks true material performance and can lead to inconsistent results between laboratories or production batches.
Cutting and Selecting Specimens
- Cut at least 5 specimens of approximately 100 mm × 100 mm (or as specified by the test standard)
- Take samples from different areas across the roll width and along its length to capture structural variability
- Avoid areas with visible defects, folds, or contamination
- For asymmetric fabrics, mark the technical face and record which side will face the low pressure side during testing
Conditioning Requirements
Environmental conditions significantly affect air permeability measurements because humidity influences fiber swelling and fabric structure:
- Pre-relax samples if they were folded, rolled, or compressed during transport
- Condition specimens in a standard atmosphere—typically 20 ± 2°C and 65 ± 4% RH per ISO 139—for at least 24 hours
- Maintain conditioning until testing; avoid handling specimens with bare hands after equilibration
Special Considerations for Coated or Multilayer Fabrics
| Fabric Type | Orientation Requirement | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Single-layer woven | Technical face down (toward low pressure) | Follow standard or customer specification |
| Coated fabrics | Coating facing low pressure side | Prevents coating damage from clamping pressure |
| Multilayer composites | Specified layer sequence | Document orientation in test report |
| Nonwovens | Either side unless specified | Some nonwovens show 10–50% directional difference |
Step-by-Step Air Permeability Test Procedure for Fabrics
This section provides a practical, chronological procedure based on ISO 9237 and ASTM D737. Following these steps systematically will help you measure air permeability consistently and generate accurate data for quality decisions.
Step 1 – Instrument Setup
- Connect power supply and compressed air or vacuum source
- Verify that test heads and rubber gaskets are clean and undamaged
- Check the calibration certificate date; recalibrate if overdue
- Zero the pressure gauge and flow meter with no specimen installed
- Confirm the instrument displays stable zero readings before proceeding
Step 2 – Selecting Test Parameters
Choose test conditions based on your governing standard or customer specification:
| Parameter | Typical Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Test area | 20 cm² | Default for apparel fabrics; use 5 cm² for tight weaves, 100 cm² for open structures |
| Pressure drop | 100 Pa | Common for clothing textiles; 200 Pa for industrial fabrics |
| Number of readings | ≥5 per specimen | More readings improve statistical confidence |
Record the selected parameters before beginning measurements.
Step 3 – Mounting the Specimen
- Place the conditioned specimen flat on the test head, technical face oriented as required
- Center the test area over the orifice, ensuring no creases cross the measurement zone
- Lower the clamping ring smoothly and tighten to compress the gasket
- Inspect the seal visually—there should be no visible gap where air could bypass the fabric
- If the specimen slips or bunches, reposition and reclamp
Step 4 – Running the Test
- Initiate airflow so the instrument adjusts automatically toward the target pressure difference
- Wait until both pressure and flow readings stabilize—typically 5–10 seconds
- Record the displayed air flow rate or direct air permeability value
- Note any fluctuations; unstable readings may indicate edge leakage or instrument issues
Step 5 – Repetition
- Test each specimen in at least 5 distinct, non-overlapping areas
- Calculate the mean value and standard deviation for the specimen
- Repeat across all 5+ specimens to generate a sample-level average
- A coefficient of variation below 10% indicates good repeatability; higher values suggest material variability or procedural issues
Step 6 – Calculations
Modern instruments typically output results directly, but the underlying formula is:
Air Permeability = Volume Flow Rate ÷ Test Area
For example, if 400 cm³ of air passes through a 20 cm² specimen each second at 100 Pa:
- Air Permeability = 400 cm³/s ÷ 20 cm² = 20 cm³/(cm²·s) or equivalently 200 mm/s
Convert units as required by your reporting standard (mm/s, L/m²/s, CFM/ft²).
Documentation Checklist
Always record the following to make the procedure auditable:
- Test area and pressure differential used
- Atmospheric conditions during testing
- Sample identification and orientation
- Individual readings and calculated statistics
- Instrument model and calibration status
- Test date and operator name
Air Permeability Test Procedure for Building Envelopes (Blower Door)
For whole buildings, air permeability is measured as the air leakage rate through the envelope at a reference pressure—typically 50 Pa—normalized by envelope area or floor area. This air testing procedure quantifies how easily air can pass through the building fabric, directly impacting energy performance and indoor air quality.
Preparation
- Schedule the test after major envelope work is complete (windows, doors, seals installed)
- Document which intentional openings will be sealed: trickle vents, extract fans, flues, letterboxes
- Seal openings temporarily using appropriate materials (tape, inflatable bungs, sheet plastic)
- Record the building’s floor area and envelope area for normalization calculations
- Ensure all internal doors are open to create a single pressure zone
Equipment Setup
- Fit the adjustable blower door frame into the main external doorway
- Mount the calibrated fan in the temporary panel, ensuring an airtight seal around the frame
- Connect inside pressure hose to a location away from direct airflow (at least 1.5 m from the fan)
- Connect outside pressure hose to a sheltered external point, protected from wind effects
- Link hoses to the digital manometer and verify communication with test software
- Confirm baseline pressure reading is near 0 Pa with the fan off
Test Sequence
The test creates a series of pressure points to characterize the envelope’s flow–pressure relationship:
- Start fan at low speed and gradually increase to achieve approximately 10 Pa difference
- Record airflow rate at 10 Pa, then increment pressure in 5–10 Pa steps up to 60 Pa
- Allow readings to stabilize at each point before logging
- Perform pressurization run (pushing air into building) first
- Repeat with depressurization run (pulling air out) if required by your test standard
- Aim for at least 5 data points across the pressure range for curve fitting
Data Handling
Test software fits the measured data to a power-law relationship:
Q = C × ΔP^n
Where Q is airflow rate, C is a flow coefficient, ΔP is pressure difference, and n is the flow exponent (typically 0.5–1.0).
From this relationship, the software calculates:
| Metric | Typical Units | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Air permeability at 50 Pa | m³/(h·m²) | Airflow per square metre of envelope area |
| Air changes per hour at 50 Pa (ACH50) | h⁻¹ | Airflow divided by building volume |
| Equivalent leakage area | cm² | Hypothetical hole size causing same leakage |
Quality Checks
Before accepting results:
- Verify wind speed remained below 6 m/s during testing (check local weather station)
- Confirm indoor–outdoor temperature difference was manageable (ideally <15°C)
- Review the flow–pressure curve for smooth progression; erratic points suggest doors opening or gusty conditions
- Use smoke pencils or infrared imaging to identify major leakage paths during or after the pressure test
- If results seem anomalous, check that all temporary seals remained intact
Test Certificate Requirements
The final certificate should document:
- Building address, description, and floor/envelope areas
- Test date and weather conditions
- Standards followed (e.g., ATTMA TSL1:2021)
- Openings sealed and method of sealing
- Measured air permeability result with units
- Pass/fail determination against applicable building regulations
Recommended Test Conditions and Typical Settings
Consistent environmental conditions and test conditions are essential for achieving comparable results between laboratories, test dates, and different operators. Small variations in temperature, humidity, or pressure settings can cause varying results that mask true material or building performance.
Fabric Testing Conditions
- Conditioning climate: 20 ± 2°C, 65 ± 4% RH (per ISO 139)
- Equilibration time: Minimum 24 hours; some dense materials may need 48 hours
- Test pressure drops:
- 50 Pa – Very open structures, coarse nonwovens
- 100 Pa – General apparel fabrics, sports textiles
- 200 Pa – Tighter weaves, industrial fabrics
- 500 Pa – Coated fabrics, very low permeability materials
- Test areas:
- 5 cm² – Extremely tight weaves where flow would be unmeasurable at larger areas
- 20 cm² – Default for most apparel and home textiles
- 50–100 cm² – Open nonwovens, very high air permeability materials
Building Testing Conditions
- Wind speed: Below 6 m/s (ideally calm conditions)
- Temperature difference: Indoor–outdoor ΔT < 15°C preferred
- Baseline pressure: Near 0 Pa with fan off; natural stack effect should be minimal
- Pressure range: 10–60 Pa in 5–10 Pa increments
Comparative Example
Consider two fabrics tested under the same conditions (100 Pa, 20 cm² test area):
| Fabric Type | Air Permeability | Typical Application |
|---|---|---|
| Lightweight polyester mesh | 800 mm/s | Sports T-shirt, high breathability required |
| Tight-woven nylon with DWR finish | 35 mm/s | Windproof outdoor jacket shell |
The mesh allows approximately 23 times more air flow, explaining why it feels cooler but offers no wind protection—demonstrating how test results translate to wearer’s comfort and functional performance.
Interpreting Results and Common Acceptance Criteria
Raw air permeability numbers must be interpreted against product requirements, comfort targets, or regulatory limits. A value that represents a pass for one application may be a clear failure for another.
Textile Acceptance Criteria
Higher permeability improves breathability but reduces wind resistance. Typical target ranges include:
| Application | Target Range | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Windproof outerwear | < 50 mm/s | Prevent air leakage; maintain thermal insulation |
| Softshell jackets | 50–150 mm/s | Balance breathability and wind protection |
| Sports T-shirts | 200–800 mm/s | Maximize airflow for cooling during activity |
| Filtration media | Varies by efficiency class | Must balance airflow rate against particle capture |
| Parachute fabric | 300–500 cm³/(cm²·min) | Uniform permeability ensures reliable deployment |
When results fall outside specification, consider adjusting fabric structure, finishing treatments, or coating weight.
Building Acceptance Criteria
UK and European building regulations typically specify maximum air permeability at 50 Pa:
| Building Type | Typical Limit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings (Part L 2021) | 8 m³/(h·m²) @ 50 Pa | Some schemes require 5 m³/(h·m²) |
| Low-energy dwellings | 3 m³/(h·m²) @ 50 Pa | Requires MVHR for proper ventilation |
| Passivhaus standard | ≤ 0.6 ACH50 | Extremely airtight; mechanical ventilation essential |
| Commercial buildings | Varies by use class | May follow ATTMA TSL2 guidance |
Lower air leakage rates improve energy efficient operation but may require mechanical ventilation systems to maintain indoor air quality. Buildings failing their target must undergo leak detection and remediation before retesting.
Worked Pass/Fail Examples
Example 1 – Outdoor Jacket Fabric:
- Measured: 42 mm/s at 100 Pa
- Specification: < 50 mm/s
- Result: PASS – Suitable for windproof outdoor clothing
Example 2 – New Dwelling:
- Measured: 6.2 m³/(h·m²) @ 50 Pa
- Target: 5 m³/(h·m²) @ 50 Pa
- Result: FAIL – Must identify and seal leakage paths, then retest
Best Practices, Troubleshooting, and Retesting
Robust procedure includes proactive checks for errors and clear guidance on handling inconsistent results. Catching problems early prevents wasted testing time and incorrect quality decisions.
Common Issues in Fabric Testing
| Problem | Likely Cause | Effect on Results | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificially high permeability | Edge leakage around clamp | Bypass air inflates readings 10–25% | Check gasket condition; increase clamping pressure |
| Unstable readings | Insufficient stabilization time | Varying results between readings | Wait longer; verify pressure source stability |
| Unexpectedly low values | Sample over-clamped or folded | Compressed structure reduces flow | Reposition specimen; ensure flat mounting |
| Poor repeatability | Unconditioned samples | Moisture variability affects structure | Extend conditioning time; verify atmosphere |
| Zero or minimal flow | Clogged instrument filters | Restricts airflow path | Clean or replace filters per maintenance schedule |
Common Issues in Building Testing
| Problem | Likely Cause | Effect on Results | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluctuating pressure readings | Wind gusts >6 m/s | Unstable baseline; erratic curve | Reschedule for calmer conditions |
| Higher than expected leakage | Unsealed intentional openings | Inflated air permeability value | Re-check all vents, flues, and penetrations |
| Results outside calibrated range | Building too leaky or too tight | Inaccurate extrapolation to 50 Pa | Use different fan ring; verify equipment range |
| Pressure won’t stabilize | Door opened during test | Massive uncontrolled air path | Secure building; restart test sequence |
Retesting Protocols
- Single measurement outliers: If one reading deviates by more than 20% from others, investigate cause before discarding
- Systematic deviation: If all readings trend high or low, check calibration status and environmental factors
- Post-remediation retests: After sealing leaks in buildings or adjusting fabric processes, allow sufficient time before retesting (fabrics: recondition; buildings: sealants must cure)
- Full retest triggers: Equipment malfunction, specimen contamination, or protocol deviation discovered mid-test
Documentation Recommendations
- Develop and maintain a written Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) referencing ISO 9237, ASTM D737, ATTMA, or other standards as applicable
- Log all calibration dates, maintenance activities, and equipment serial numbers
- Archive raw data alongside calculated results for traceability
- Review procedures annually and update for new developments in standards or equipment
Conclusion
A reliable air permeability test procedure combines adherence to recognized standards, correctly specified and calibrated equipment, rigorous sample preparation, and disciplined step-by-step execution. Whether you’re testing textile fabrics for breathability and wind resistance or measuring building envelope air tightness for energy efficiency and regulatory compliance, the fundamentals remain consistent: control environmental conditions, apply the correct pressure differential, measure air flow accurately, and document everything for traceability.
Controlling and measuring air permeability is essential for both material performance—affecting wearer’s comfort, filtration efficiency, and durability—and building performance, where it directly impacts heat loss, moisture control, and energy consumption. Organizations conducting this testing should develop or refine their internal procedures based on the structure outlined here, ensuring alignment with standards like ISO 9237, ASTM D737, or ATTMA guidance. With a well-documented SOP, calibrated instruments, and trained operators, you can generate accurate data that supports confident quality decisions and regulatory compliance.


